中国的住宅标识设计文化观念融入占主导地位的国家

中国的标识设计文化多样性视为一种有少数群体提出的一种他者的术语，而是佳琪视为公共空间必不可少的组成部分，其实，多样性概念的提出，不是让人们努力实现差异的去种族化，而是不自觉地扩大了差异性的范围，加性别年龄取向是否等条目纳入讨论范围之中，最后都要新的住宅概念了，人们可以开到差异的复杂性，抛开问题，表象差异，不再成为需要被同化被解决的问题，而是成为住宅公共文化空气的积极资源，换句话说，他差异性变得有效了。21世纪，来哉。可以开拓，是多样性取得了少数群体的。重要标志之一。从传统的角度看，与少数群体相关的议题和政治事务，往往是在严格的背景下解决的，解决方法，几乎是根据该国少数群体和多数群体的关系来决定的，举个例子，如果少数群体都是自己的文化，需要被国家承认。

会实行一种大多数群体包容少数群体的文化和社会政策，这么做的结果通常是少数群体的中国的标识设计文化观念融入占主导地位的国家文化社会秩序中。从这一视角来看，少数群的问题就被基本解决了，比如在美术馆里四人设立。少数民族艺术展厅等看上去是对少数文化的包容，在设计一种同质化的表面的解决方法，不仅如此在21世纪以来，自动整合主义方式的困难局限性已经开始。愈发妥，现在不断珍藏的。移民文化的转变，少数群体的问题已经跳脱到国家参考范围之内，开始会当作多样性那种。我在参考了。我们刚从同志走下多样，另一个需要着重探讨的问题就是公民身份的改变，这些决定了在公共。空间的美术馆中，中国的住宅标识设计公共对概念的成那范围公民身份代表了一个自然人在社会中的成分，把形形色色的人带入到一个政治共同体中。

China's logo design culture concept is integrated into the dominant country

The cultural diversity of Chinese logo design is regarded as a term of the other proposed by minority groups, but Jiaqi regards it as an indispensable part of public space. In fact, the concept of diversity is not to make people work hard. To achieve the de-racialization of differences, but to unconsciously expand the scope of differences, whether to add gender and age orientation and other items into the scope of discussion, finally a new concept, people can explore the complexity of differences, throw away Opening problems and differences in appearance no longer become problems that need to be assimilated and solved, but become a positive resource for public cultural air. In other words, their differences become effective. The 21st century is here. It can be exploited, but diversity has achieved the minority. One of the important signs. From a traditional perspective, issues and political affairs related to minorities are often resolved in a strict context. The solution is almost determined based on the relationship between the minority and the majority in the country. For example, if Minorities have their own culture and need to be recognized by the state.

A cultural and social policy that allows the majority to accommodate the minorities will be implemented. The result of this is usually that the minority groups’ Chinese logo design cultural concepts are integrated into the dominant national cultural and social order. From this perspective, the problem of minority groups has been basically solved, such as setting up four people in an art gallery. Minority art exhibition halls, etc., seem to be tolerant of minority cultures. They are designing a homogenous surface solution. Not only that, since the 21st century, the difficult limitations of automatic integrationism have begun. It's getting better and better, and now it's constantly being collected. With the change of immigration culture, the problem of minority groups has escaped from the scope of national reference, and began to be regarded as the kind of diversity. I'm referencing it. We have just stepped down from being gay. Another issue that needs to be discussed is the change of citizenship. These decisions are in the public. In the art gallery of the space, the scope of Chinese logo design and the concept of public citizenship represents a natural person's component in society, bringing all kinds of people into a political community.